USCIS Will Now Consider Contributions and Scrutinize Minor Infractions in Citizenship Determinations
The Trump administration has issued new guidance that significantly alters how U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) evaluates whether applicants meet the “good moral character” (GMC) requirement for naturalization.
In a policy memorandum released on August 15, USCIS directed officers to adopt a more comprehensive and rigorous review of an applicant’s behavior and background. Instead of solely focusing on disqualifying offenses such as certain crimes, the agency now instructs officers to consider a broader set of factors, including positive community contributions and conduct that may be lawful but socially questionable.
The agency stated in the memo:
“Naturalization is envisioned not simply as a procedural immigration benefit—the greatest of all—but as a significant legal transformation, an assimilation into a country that demands both allegiance and character.”
What Are the Key Changes?
Traditionally, the good moral character standard has been a fundamental part of the naturalization process. Historically, applicants could generally qualify unless they committed certain serious offenses—such as aggravated felonies, false claims to U.S. citizenship, or habitual drunkenness—during the statutory period (usually 3 or 5 years) prior to their application.
Under the new policy, USCIS officials are instructed to adopt a more expansive approach, emphasizing both positive attributes and stricter scrutiny of negative conduct:
Increased Emphasis on Positive Attributes:
• Long-term community involvement
• Family caregiving and responsibilities
• Educational achievements
• Lawful and stable employment history
• Financial responsibility, including tax compliance
• Duration of lawful presence in the United States
Enhanced Scrutiny of Negative Conduct:
• Behavior that may be legally permissible but socially questionable (e.g., repeated traffic violations, harassment, aggressive solicitation)
• Conditional bars such as multiple DUIs, unlawful voting, or drug-related offenses
• Any conduct deviating from the “average behavior” of community members
Reactions and Commentary
According to USCIS spokesperson Matthew J. Tragesser, in an interview with Newsweek:
“U.S. citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship—it should only be offered to the world’s best of the best. Today, USCIS is adding a new element to the naturalization process that ensures America’s newest citizens not only embrace our culture, history, and language but also demonstrate Good Moral Character. This memo ensures USCIS officers consider an applicant’s positive contributions—such as community involvement, achievements, and financial responsibility— rather than merely the absence of misconduct. USCIS remains committed to restoring integrity in the nation’s immigration system—especially for such a prestigious privilege as citizenship.”
USCIS further clarified in the memo:
“This approach will empower officers to conduct a comprehensive review of applicants’ full histories, where no statutory or regulatory bars exist, and to require applicants to present their full story—demonstrating how their conduct aligns with current ethical standards and community expectations.”
Next Steps
This memorandum, effective immediately, mandates that USCIS officers adopt a holistic evaluation process when assessing naturalization applicants. As USCIS states:
“Officers must evaluate whether the applicant has affirmatively established that they meet their burden of demonstrating their worthiness to assume the rights and responsibilities of U.S. citizenship.”
Final Thoughts
Critics interpret these changes as part of broader efforts by the current administration to restrict immigration and limit naturalization opportunities. Whether viewed as a necessary enhancement of integrity or a step in tightening eligibility, these policy shifts are poised to impact many applicants moving forward. Legal practitioners should closely monitor developments and advise clients accordingly.